Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Morgan, 01-31467 (2002)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 01-31467 Visitors: 27
Filed: Jul. 25, 2002
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-31467 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MAXON HARVEY MORGAN, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 93-CR-491-5-N - July 24, 2002 Before WIENER, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Maxon Harvey Morgan, federal prisoner # 239980-034, appeals the denial of a motion for a transcript at government expense
More
               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT



                           No. 01-31467
                         Summary Calendar



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                         Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MAXON HARVEY MORGAN,

                                         Defendant-Appellant.

                       --------------------
          Appeal from the United States District Court
              for the Eastern District of Louisiana
                      USDC No. 93-CR-491-5-N
                       --------------------
                           July 24, 2002

Before WIENER, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Maxon Harvey Morgan, federal prisoner # 239980-034, appeals

the denial of a motion for a transcript at government expense to

appeal the transfer of a petition for habeas corpus pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 2241 to this court for authorization to file a

successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion.   See Brinar v. Williamson,

245 F.3d 515
, 518 (5th Cir. 2001)(transfer order is a

nonappealable interlocutory order).   A transcript is not


     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
                           No. 01-31467
                                -2-

necessary to determine such an appeal.    This appeal is without

arguable merit and thus frivolous.   Howard v. King, 
707 F.2d 215
,

219-20 (5th Cir. 1983).   Accordingly, it is DISMISSED.   See 5TH

CIR. R. 42.2.

     APPEAL DISMISSED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer