Filed: Jul. 15, 2002
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-40880 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MARIA DEL CARMEN NUNEZ-CECENEZ, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-01-CR-165-1 - July 12, 2002 Before DeMOSS, PARKER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Maria Del Carmen Nunez-Cecenez (Nunez) has requested leave to withdra
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-40880 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MARIA DEL CARMEN NUNEZ-CECENEZ, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-01-CR-165-1 - July 12, 2002 Before DeMOSS, PARKER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Maria Del Carmen Nunez-Cecenez (Nunez) has requested leave to withdraw..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-40880
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
MARIA DEL CARMEN NUNEZ-CECENEZ,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. B-01-CR-165-1
--------------------
July 12, 2002
Before DeMOSS, PARKER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Maria Del
Carmen Nunez-Cecenez (Nunez) has requested leave to withdraw as
counsel and has filed a brief as required by Anders v.
California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Nunez has not filed a response.
Our independent review of the brief and record discloses no
nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, the motion for leave to
withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No.
-2-
responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 5TH CIR.
R. 42.2.