Filed: Jun. 20, 2002
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-41016 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus GONZALO BAEZA-SANCHEZ, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. L-01-CR-504-ALL - June 19, 2002 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Gonzalo Baeza-Sanchez appeals from his guilty-plea conviction for illegally reentering the United States afte
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-41016 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus GONZALO BAEZA-SANCHEZ, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. L-01-CR-504-ALL - June 19, 2002 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Gonzalo Baeza-Sanchez appeals from his guilty-plea conviction for illegally reentering the United States after..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-41016
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
GONZALO BAEZA-SANCHEZ,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. L-01-CR-504-ALL
--------------------
June 19, 2002
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Gonzalo Baeza-Sanchez appeals from his guilty-plea
conviction for illegally reentering the United States after
having been deported subsequent to an aggravated felony
conviction, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. He argues that his
indictment violates the Fifth and Sixth Amendments because it
does not allege general intent.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 01-41016
-2-
As Baeza-Sanchez concedes, however, his argument is
foreclosed by Fifth Circuit precedent. See United States v.
Guzman-Ocampo,
236 F.3d 233, 237-39 (5th Cir. 2000), cert.
denied,
533 U.S. 953 (2001); see also United States v. Berrios-
Centeno,
250 F.3d 294, 297-300 (5th Cir.), cert. denied,
122
S. Ct. 288 (2001). He raises the argument only to preserve it
for Supreme Court review.
The district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.