Filed: Aug. 23, 2002
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-41223 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus CARLOS HUMBERTO GONZALEZ-AVILA, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. L-01-CR-547-ALL - August 21, 2002 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Carlos Humberto Gonzalez-Avila appeals his guilty-plea conviction of being found in the United States witho
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-41223 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus CARLOS HUMBERTO GONZALEZ-AVILA, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. L-01-CR-547-ALL - August 21, 2002 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Carlos Humberto Gonzalez-Avila appeals his guilty-plea conviction of being found in the United States withou..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-41223
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
CARLOS HUMBERTO GONZALEZ-AVILA,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. L-01-CR-547-ALL
--------------------
August 21, 2002
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Carlos Humberto Gonzalez-Avila appeals his guilty-plea
conviction of being found in the United States without permission
after deportation, a violation of 8 U.S.C. ยง 1326. He argues
that his indictment is deficient because it does not allege
general intent. As Gonzalez-Avila concedes, his contention is
foreclosed by Fifth Circuit precedent. See United States v.
Guzman-Ocampo,
236 F.3d 233 (5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied, 533
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 01-41223
-2-
U.S. 953 (2001); United States v. Berrios-Centeno,
250 F.3d 294,
297 (5th Cir.), cert. denied,
122 S. Ct. 288 (2001). Gonzalez-
Avila raises the issue only to preserve it for review by the
Supreme Court.
The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.