Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Trujillo, 01-41247 (2002)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 01-41247 Visitors: 15
Filed: Aug. 29, 2002
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-41247 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus INOCENCIO LARA TRUJILLO, also known as Jesus Abel Montes, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas (B-01-CR-295-1) _ August 29, 2002 Before JONES, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Appointed counsel for Inocencio Lara Trujillo has requested leave to withdraw as counsel and has fil
More
                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT



                            No. 01-41247
                          Summary Calendar



                      UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                  Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                versus

               INOCENCIO LARA TRUJILLO, also known as
                          Jesus Abel Montes,

                                                  Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________________________________

           Appeal from the United States District Court
                for the Southern District of Texas
                          (B-01-CR-295-1)
_________________________________________________________________
                          August 29, 2002

Before JONES, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

      Appointed counsel for Inocencio Lara Trujillo has requested

leave to withdraw as counsel and has filed a brief in accordance

with Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967).          Trujillo has

received a copy of counsel’s motion and brief and has filed a

response.   Our independent review of the record, counsel’s brief,

and   Trujillo’s    response   discloses   no   nonfrivolous    issue.


*
     Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED;

counsel is excused from further responsibilities; and the appeal is

DISMISSED.   See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. Trujillo’s motion for appointment

of new counsel is DENIED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer