Foster v. Kelly Springfield, 01-41459 (2002)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Number: 01-41459
Visitors: 20
Filed: Aug. 02, 2002
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-41459 Summary Calendar DEBRA FOSTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus THE KELLY SPRINGFIELD TIRE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 6:00-CV-552 - August 1, 2002 Before DAVIS, BENAVIDES, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The plaintiff-appellant in this case brought suit alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of race and gender pursua
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-41459 Summary Calendar DEBRA FOSTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus THE KELLY SPRINGFIELD TIRE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 6:00-CV-552 - August 1, 2002 Before DAVIS, BENAVIDES, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The plaintiff-appellant in this case brought suit alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of race and gender pursuan..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-41459
Summary Calendar
DEBRA FOSTER,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
THE KELLY SPRINGFIELD TIRE COMPANY,
Defendant-Appellee.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Texas
USDC No. 6:00-CV-552
--------------------
August 1, 2002
Before DAVIS, BENAVIDES, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The plaintiff-appellant in this case brought suit alleging discrimination in employment on
the basis of race and gender pursuant to Title VII. The plaintiff-appellant also brought suit
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1981. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the
employer. We have reviewed the record and the briefs and determined that there is no merit to
the plaintiff-appellant’s assertions on appeal essentially for the reasons stated in the district court’s
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be
published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
well-reasoned order on summary judgment dated November 20, 2001.
AFFIRMED.
Source: CourtListener