Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Foster v. Kelly Springfield, 01-41459 (2002)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 01-41459 Visitors: 20
Filed: Aug. 02, 2002
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-41459 Summary Calendar DEBRA FOSTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus THE KELLY SPRINGFIELD TIRE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 6:00-CV-552 - August 1, 2002 Before DAVIS, BENAVIDES, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The plaintiff-appellant in this case brought suit alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of race and gender pursua
More
                        IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT



                                            No. 01-41459
                                          Summary Calendar



DEBRA FOSTER,

                                                                Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

THE KELLY SPRINGFIELD TIRE COMPANY,

                                                                Defendant-Appellee.

                                         --------------------
                            Appeal from the United States District Court
                                 for the Eastern District of Texas
                                     USDC No. 6:00-CV-552
                                         --------------------
                                          August 1, 2002

Before DAVIS, BENAVIDES, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

         The plaintiff-appellant in this case brought suit alleging discrimination in employment on

the basis of race and gender pursuant to Title VII. The plaintiff-appellant also brought suit

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1981. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the

employer. We have reviewed the record and the briefs and determined that there is no merit to

the plaintiff-appellant’s assertions on appeal essentially for the reasons stated in the district court’s



         *
          Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be
published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
well-reasoned order on summary judgment dated November 20, 2001.

      AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer