Filed: Jul. 18, 2002
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-41470 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus BENITO RAMIREZ-YBARRA, also known as Benito Ramirez, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-01-CR-396-1 - July 17, 2002 Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Benito Ramirez-Ybarra pleaded guilty to being found in the United States without permission aft
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-41470 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus BENITO RAMIREZ-YBARRA, also known as Benito Ramirez, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-01-CR-396-1 - July 17, 2002 Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Benito Ramirez-Ybarra pleaded guilty to being found in the United States without permission afte..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-41470
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
BENITO RAMIREZ-YBARRA, also known as Benito Ramirez,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. B-01-CR-396-1
--------------------
July 17, 2002
Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Benito Ramirez-Ybarra pleaded guilty to being found in the
United States without permission after having been previously
deported. He was sentenced on December 3, 2001, and the 2001
Sentencing Guidelines, which became effective November 1, 2001,
apply to his case.
Ramirez appeals the district court’s increase of his offense
level by 16 under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A). The district court
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 01-41470
-2-
determined that Ramirez’ prior conviction for being a felon in
possession of a firearm was a firearms offense under U.S.S.G.
§ 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(iii). However, the district court did not
determine whether the gun involved in Ramirez’ prior offense fell
within the definition of firearm under 26 U.S.C. § 5845(a), as
referenced in Application Note 1(B)(v)(II) of U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2.
The Government concedes that the record is devoid of evidence to
allow for such a determination. The district court’s sentence is
VACATED and this case is REMANDED so that the district court can
make such a determination.