Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Cantu, 01-41496 (2002)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 01-41496 Visitors: 50
Filed: Aug. 23, 2002
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-41496 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus DIEGO CANTU, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. C-01-CR-21-2 - August 21, 2002 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The court-appointed counsel for Diego Cantu has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. Califo
More
               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT



                           No. 01-41496
                        Conference Calendar



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                         Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

DIEGO CANTU,

                                         Defendant-Appellant.

                       --------------------
          Appeal from the United States District Court
               for the Southern District of Texas
                      USDC No. C-01-CR-21-2
                       --------------------
                          August 21, 2002

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     The court-appointed counsel for Diego Cantu has moved for

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v.

California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967).   Cantu has filed a response

wherein he challenges the determination that he was on probation

at the time he committed the instant offense.   Our independent

review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous

issue in this direct appeal.   Accordingly, the motion for leave


     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
                          No. 01-41496
                               -2-

to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.     See 5TH

CIR. R. 42.2.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer