Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Salinas, 01-50246 (2002)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 01-50246 Visitors: 50
Filed: Aug. 23, 2002
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-50246 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MARTIN SALINAS, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. DR—00-CR-653-1 - August 21, 2002 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Court-appointed counsel representing Martin Salinas has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with
More
                IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT



                             No. 01-50246
                         Conference Calendar



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                          Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MARTIN SALINAS,
                                          Defendant-Appellant.

                       --------------------
          Appeal from the United States District Court
                for the Western District of Texas
                     USDC No. DR—00-CR-653-1
                       --------------------
                          August 21, 2002

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Court-appointed counsel representing Martin Salinas has

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance

with Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967).    Salinas was

provided with a copy of counsel's Anders motion and brief.       His

initial response requesting the dismissal of his second appeal

was ambiguous; therefore, the court requested a clarification of

his response.   Salinas has not responded.



     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
                           No. 01-50246
                                -2-

     Our independent review of the record and counsel's brief

shows that there are no nonfrivolous issues for appeal.

Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,

counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the

appeal is DISMISSED.   See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.; FED. R. APP.

P. 34(a)(2)(A).

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer