Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Wright, 01-50448 (2002)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 01-50448 Visitors: 16
Filed: Apr. 12, 2002
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-50448 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus CALVIN DAVID WRIGHT, also known as Cal David Wright, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. MO-99-CR-122-ALL - April 11, 2002 Before SMITH, DeMOSS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Counsel appointed to represent Calvin David Wright has moved for leave to withdraw and has fi
More
                IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT



                             No. 01-50448
                         Conference Calendar



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                          Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

CALVIN DAVID WRIGHT, also known as
Cal David Wright,

                                          Defendant-Appellant.

                         --------------------
            Appeal from the United States District Court
                  for the Western District of Texas
                      USDC No. MO-99-CR-122-ALL
                         --------------------
                            April 11, 2002

Before SMITH, DeMOSS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Counsel appointed to represent Calvin David Wright has moved

for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders

v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967).    Wright has not filed a

response.   Our independent review of the brief and the record

discloses no nonfrivolous issue.   Accordingly, counsel’s motion

for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.      See 5TH

CIR. R. 42.2.


     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer