Filed: Feb. 18, 2002
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-50592 Summary Calendar MARY E. VELA, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus F. WHITTEN PETERS, Secretary of the Department of the Air Force, Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas SA-99-CV-850 February 15, 2002 Before POLITZ, STEWART, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Mary E. Vela appeals the dismissal, alternatively, adverse summary judgment, * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Co
Summary: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-50592 Summary Calendar MARY E. VELA, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus F. WHITTEN PETERS, Secretary of the Department of the Air Force, Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas SA-99-CV-850 February 15, 2002 Before POLITZ, STEWART, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Mary E. Vela appeals the dismissal, alternatively, adverse summary judgment, * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Cou..
More
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-50592
Summary Calendar
MARY E. VELA,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
F. WHITTEN PETERS, Secretary of
the Department of the Air Force,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
SA-99-CV-850
February 15, 2002
Before POLITZ, STEWART, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Mary E. Vela appeals the dismissal, alternatively, adverse summary judgment,
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in
5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
of her claims against the Secretary of the Department of the Air Force for alleged
discrimination on the basis of national origin, gender and age, and hostile environment
and retaliation in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. ยงยง
2000e et seq. Having reviewed the record, briefs of the parties and dispositive law, and
on the facts as found, authorities cited, and analysis made by the Magistrate Judge in
her careful and thorough Memorandum Decision and Order entered and filed on May
23, 2001, the judgment appealed is AFFIRMED.
2