Filed: Jun. 21, 2002
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-50697 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JOSE HUGO MUNOZ-HERNANDEZ, also known as Jose Hugo Sanchez-Vasquez, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. DR-01-CR-162-1 - June 18, 2002 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Bryan P. Cartall, counsel appointed to represent Jose Hugo Munoz-H
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-50697 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JOSE HUGO MUNOZ-HERNANDEZ, also known as Jose Hugo Sanchez-Vasquez, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. DR-01-CR-162-1 - June 18, 2002 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Bryan P. Cartall, counsel appointed to represent Jose Hugo Munoz-He..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-50697
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JOSE HUGO MUNOZ-HERNANDEZ, also known as
Jose Hugo Sanchez-Vasquez,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. DR-01-CR-162-1
--------------------
June 18, 2002
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Bryan P. Cartall, counsel appointed to represent Jose Hugo
Munoz-Hernandez, has filed a motion for leave to withdraw and has
filed a brief as required by Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738
(1967). Munoz-Hernandez has not filed a response. Our
independent review of the brief and the record discloses no
nonfrivolous issue in this direct appeal. Accordingly, the
motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 01-20376
-2-
further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.