Filed: Mar. 08, 2002
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-60126 RAFAEL HERNANDEZ-IBANEZ, Petitioner, versus JOHN ASHCROFT, ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondent. - Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A91-259-619 - March 7, 2002 Before REAVLEY, WIENER, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Rafael Hernandez-Ibanez petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) holding that Hernandez- Ibanez’s state conviction for felony driving
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-60126 RAFAEL HERNANDEZ-IBANEZ, Petitioner, versus JOHN ASHCROFT, ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondent. - Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A91-259-619 - March 7, 2002 Before REAVLEY, WIENER, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Rafael Hernandez-Ibanez petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) holding that Hernandez- Ibanez’s state conviction for felony driving ..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-60126
RAFAEL HERNANDEZ-IBANEZ,
Petitioner,
versus
JOHN ASHCROFT,
ATTORNEY GENERAL,
Respondent.
--------------------
Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
BIA No. A91-259-619
--------------------
March 7, 2002
Before REAVLEY, WIENER, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Rafael Hernandez-Ibanez petitions for review of an order of
the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) holding that Hernandez-
Ibanez’s state conviction for felony driving while intoxicated
was an aggravated felony warranting his removal from this
country. The respondent and Hernandez-Ibanez have filed a joint
motion to remand the case to the BIA for reconsideration in light
of United States v. Chapa-Garza,
243 F.3d 921, 927 (5th Cir.
2001). Both parties also move to withdraw the petitioner’s
“response to ‘respondent’s motion to remand.’”
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 01-60126
-2-
Hernandez-Ibanez’s petition for review is GRANTED. The
order of the BIA is VACATED, and this case is REMANDED to the BIA
for disposition consistent with
Chapa-Garza, 243 F.3d at 927.
All other outstanding motions are DENIED.