Filed: Jul. 19, 2002
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ Consolidated Case Nos. 01-60543, 01-60544, 01-60545, 01-60546, 01-60547, 01-60548, 01-60549, 01-60550, 01-60551, 01-60552, 01-60553, 01-60554, 01-60555, 01-60556 _ BANK ONE, N.A., Plaintiff-Appellee, versus WILLIE QUINN, JAMES BIRDSONG, ANNIE WHEELER, ROBERT JACKSON, PERCY CATCHINGS, RICKY DILLON, QUAKO CURTIS, MARGARETTA LOFTON, ELOISE TILLIS, JAMES TILLIS, DAIRY STRICKLAND, TRENTICE WILSON, WILLIE MCRUNNELS, GERTRUDE MILLER, AND RUB
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ Consolidated Case Nos. 01-60543, 01-60544, 01-60545, 01-60546, 01-60547, 01-60548, 01-60549, 01-60550, 01-60551, 01-60552, 01-60553, 01-60554, 01-60555, 01-60556 _ BANK ONE, N.A., Plaintiff-Appellee, versus WILLIE QUINN, JAMES BIRDSONG, ANNIE WHEELER, ROBERT JACKSON, PERCY CATCHINGS, RICKY DILLON, QUAKO CURTIS, MARGARETTA LOFTON, ELOISE TILLIS, JAMES TILLIS, DAIRY STRICKLAND, TRENTICE WILSON, WILLIE MCRUNNELS, GERTRUDE MILLER, AND RUBY..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
__________________________
Consolidated Case Nos. 01-60543, 01-60544, 01-60545,
01-60546, 01-60547, 01-60548, 01-60549, 01-60550,
01-60551, 01-60552, 01-60553, 01-60554, 01-60555, 01-60556
__________________________
BANK ONE, N.A.,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
WILLIE QUINN, JAMES BIRDSONG, ANNIE WHEELER, ROBERT JACKSON, PERCY
CATCHINGS, RICKY DILLON, QUAKO CURTIS, MARGARETTA LOFTON, ELOISE
TILLIS, JAMES TILLIS, DAIRY STRICKLAND, TRENTICE WILSON, WILLIE
MCRUNNELS, GERTRUDE MILLER, AND RUBY HARRINGTON
Defendants-Appellants.
___________________________________________________
Appeals from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Mississippi
(3:01-CV-65-BN)
___________________________________________________
July 18, 2002
Before WIENER, E. GARZA, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM1:
Appellants challenge the district court’s rulings granting
Bank One’s motions to compel arbitration and denying their motions
for abstention and dismissal, discovery, and a jury trial. These
cases are indistinguishable from those that we reviewed and ruled
1
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
1
on in the related cases of Bank One, N.A. v. Boyd2 and Bank One,
N.A. v. Lake.3 For essentially the same reasons that are set forth
in our opinion in Boyd and in the district court’s opinion in Bank
One, N.A. v. Coates,4 the judgments of the district court in these
cases are, in all respects,
AFFIRMED.
2
288 F.3d 181 (5th Cir. 2002).
3
No. 01-60051 (5th Cir. April 5, 2002) (unpublished).
4
125 F. Supp. 2d 819 (S.D. Miss. 2001).
2