Filed: Sep. 18, 2002
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 02-10491 Summary Calendar ADRIAN GUTIERREZ MARTINEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus SANFORD LEHER, M.D.; T. PENLAND, PH.D., Defendants-Appellees. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 1:01-CV-26 - September 17, 2002 Before BARKSDALE, DeMOSS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Adrian Gutierrez Martinez, Texas prisoner number 562996, appeals the magistrate judge’s dismissal of
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 02-10491 Summary Calendar ADRIAN GUTIERREZ MARTINEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus SANFORD LEHER, M.D.; T. PENLAND, PH.D., Defendants-Appellees. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 1:01-CV-26 - September 17, 2002 Before BARKSDALE, DeMOSS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Adrian Gutierrez Martinez, Texas prisoner number 562996, appeals the magistrate judge’s dismissal of ..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-10491
Summary Calendar
ADRIAN GUTIERREZ MARTINEZ,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
SANFORD LEHER, M.D.;
T. PENLAND, PH.D.,
Defendants-Appellees.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 1:01-CV-26
--------------------
September 17, 2002
Before BARKSDALE, DeMOSS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Adrian Gutierrez Martinez, Texas prisoner number 562996,
appeals the magistrate judge’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983
complaint as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i).
He argues that the defendants acted with deliberate indifference
to his serious mental health needs by failing to provide him with
adequate treatment. He also moves this court for the appointment
of counsel. His motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 02-10491
-2-
Martinez has not shown a violation of his constitutional
rights. See Domino v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice,
239
F.3d 752, 755 (5th Cir. 2001). Accordingly, he has not shown
that the magistrate judge abused her discretion in dismissing his
complaint as frivolous. See Harper v. Showers,
174 F.3d 716, 718
& n.3 (5th Cir. 1999); Siglar v. Hightower,
112 F.3d 191, 193
(5th Cir. 1997). The judgment of the magistrate judge is
AFFIRMED.