Filed: Dec. 13, 2002
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 02-20012 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ALFREDO PORTILLO-MIRANDA, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-01-CR-496-2 - December 12, 2002 Before DAVIS, WIENER and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Robert W. Higgason, court-appointed counsel for Alfredo Portillo-Miranda, has moved for leave to withdraw and has
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 02-20012 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ALFREDO PORTILLO-MIRANDA, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-01-CR-496-2 - December 12, 2002 Before DAVIS, WIENER and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Robert W. Higgason, court-appointed counsel for Alfredo Portillo-Miranda, has moved for leave to withdraw and has f..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-20012
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ALFREDO PORTILLO-MIRANDA,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. H-01-CR-496-2
--------------------
December 12, 2002
Before DAVIS, WIENER and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Robert W. Higgason, court-appointed counsel for Alfredo
Portillo-Miranda, has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a
brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967).
Portillo-Miranda has filed a pro se response brief. Our review
of the briefs filed by counsel and Portillo-Miranda and of the
record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly,
the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 02-20012
-2-
from further responsibilities, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. Because his appeal is frivolous, Portillo-
Miranda’s motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED.
The court notes that Portillo-Miranda did not plead guilty
to harboring illegal aliens, as that charge was dismissed by the
Government.