Filed: Sep. 18, 2002
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 02-20107 Summary Calendar WALTER E. MCDONALD, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus EXXONMOBIL CHEMICAL CO., Defendant-Appellee. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-00-CV-4172 - September 17, 2002 Before JOLLY, SMITH, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Plaintiff-Appellant Walter E. McDonald (“McDonald”) timely appeals from the district court’s final judgment which dismissed wi
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 02-20107 Summary Calendar WALTER E. MCDONALD, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus EXXONMOBIL CHEMICAL CO., Defendant-Appellee. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-00-CV-4172 - September 17, 2002 Before JOLLY, SMITH, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Plaintiff-Appellant Walter E. McDonald (“McDonald”) timely appeals from the district court’s final judgment which dismissed wit..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-20107
Summary Calendar
WALTER E. MCDONALD,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
EXXONMOBIL CHEMICAL CO.,
Defendant-Appellee.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. H-00-CV-4172
--------------------
September 17, 2002
Before JOLLY, SMITH, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Plaintiff-Appellant Walter E. McDonald (“McDonald”) timely
appeals from the district court’s final judgment which dismissed
with prejudice his Title VII claims for racial discrimination, age
discrimination, and retaliation. He contends that the district
court erred in granting summary judgment to the Defendant-Appellee
ExxonMobil on each of his claims. We review de novo the district
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
1
court’s grant of summary judgment applying the same summary
judgment standard as the district court. See Walker v. Thompson,
214 F.3d 615, 624 (5th Cir. 2000).
After carefully considering the record evidence, the parties’
briefs, and the applicable law, we AFFIRM the judgment of the
district court for essentially the same reasons stated in the
district court’s January 9, 2002 summary judgment order.
AFFIRMED.
2