Filed: Nov. 08, 2002
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 02-20110 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JAIME CONRADO ISLAS, also known as Ramon, also known as Jaime Conrado-Islas, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-99-CR-546 - - - - - - - - - - November 7, 2002 Before JONES, STEWART and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender has moved
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 02-20110 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JAIME CONRADO ISLAS, also known as Ramon, also known as Jaime Conrado-Islas, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-99-CR-546 - - - - - - - - - - November 7, 2002 Before JONES, STEWART and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender has moved f..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-20110
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JAIME CONRADO ISLAS,
also known as Ramon,
also known as Jaime Conrado-Islas,
Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. H-99-CR-546
- - - - - - - - - -
November 7, 2002
Before JONES, STEWART and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender has moved for leave to
withdraw and has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Jaime Conrado Islas received a copy of
counsel’s motion and brief but has not filed a response. Islas’s
sentence was not in violation of law nor plainly unreasonable. See
United States v. Giddings,
37 F.3d 1091, 1093 (5th Cir. 1994).
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
No. 02-20110
-2-
Our review of the brief filed by counsel and of the
record discloses no other nonfrivolous issue for appeal.
Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel
is excused from further responsibilities, and the APPEAL IS
DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.