Filed: Dec. 13, 2002
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 02-20218 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus CHRISTOPHER MCKNIGHT, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-01-CR-776-ALL - December 12, 2002 Before JOLLY, JONES, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Christopher McKnight has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a b
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 02-20218 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus CHRISTOPHER MCKNIGHT, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-01-CR-776-ALL - December 12, 2002 Before JOLLY, JONES, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Christopher McKnight has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a br..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-20218
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
CHRISTOPHER MCKNIGHT,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. H-01-CR-776-ALL
--------------------
December 12, 2002
Before JOLLY, JONES, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent
Christopher McKnight has moved for leave to withdraw and has
filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
(1967). McKnight has not filed a response. Our independent
review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous
issue in this direct appeal. Accordingly, the motion for leave
to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH
CIR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
