Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Griffin, 02-30380 (2002)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 02-30380 Visitors: 75
Filed: Dec. 11, 2002
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 02-30380 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus DERRICK GRIFFIN, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 96-CR-113-4-S - December 11, 2002 Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and JONES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Derrick Griffin (“Griffin”), federal inmate #72682-079, appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to modify his sen
More
               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT



                            No. 02-30380
                        Conference Calendar



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                         Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

DERRICK GRIFFIN,

                                         Defendant-Appellant.

                         --------------------
            Appeal from the United States District Court
                for the Eastern District of Louisiana
                        USDC No. 96-CR-113-4-S
                         --------------------
                           December 11, 2002

Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and JONES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Derrick Griffin (“Griffin”), federal inmate #72682-079,

appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to modify

his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2).   Griffin argues

that Amendment 599, which amends the Application Notes for

U.S.S.G. § 2K2.4, resulted in a change to the applicable

sentencing guidelines, entitling him to a modification of his

sentence.   Amendment 599 is inapplicable to this case.    Griffin’s


     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
                           No. 02-30380
                                -2-

guideline sentencing range was computed under U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1,

not U.S.S.G. § 2K2.4.   Therefore, his claims are without merit.

The district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer