Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Cedillo-Aguirre, 02-50264 (2002)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 02-50264 Visitors: 3
Filed: Dec. 13, 2002
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 02-50264 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus CARLOS CEDILLO-AGUIRRE, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. DR-01-CR-528-ALL-WWJ - December 12, 2002 Before JOLLY, JONES, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Carlos Cedillo-Aguirre (“Cedillo”) appeals the sentencing following his jury conviction for illegal reentry into th
More
               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT



                              No. 02-50264
                          Conference Calendar



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                           Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

CARLOS CEDILLO-AGUIRRE,

                                           Defendant-Appellant.

                       --------------------
          Appeal from the United States District Court
                for the Western District of Texas
                  USDC No. DR-01-CR-528-ALL-WWJ
                       --------------------
                         December 12, 2002

Before JOLLY, JONES, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Carlos Cedillo-Aguirre (“Cedillo”) appeals the sentencing

following his jury conviction for illegal reentry into the United

States following deportation. Cedillo contends that 8 U.S.C.

§ 1326(b)(2) is unconstitutional because it treats a prior

conviction for an aggravated felony as a mere sentencing factor

and not an element of the offense.    Cedillo concedes that his

argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523


     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
                           No. 02-50264
                                -2-

U.S. 224 (1998), but he nevertheless seeks to preserve the issue

for Supreme Court review in light of the decision in Apprendi v.

New Jersey, 
530 U.S. 466
(2000).

     Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres.   See 
Apprendi, 530 U.S. at 489-90
; United States v. Dabeit, 
231 F.3d 979
, 984

(5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied, 
531 U.S. 1202
(2001).   Cedillo’s

argument is foreclosed.   Therefore, Cedillo’s conviction and

sentence are AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer