Filed: Dec. 13, 2002
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 02-60149 Conference Calendar DARRELL LYNN BANKSTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus JODY BRADLEY; ET AL., Defendants, CORRECTIONAL CORPORATION OF AMERICA (CCA), Defendant-Appellee. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi USDC No. 5:00-CV-127-BrS - December 12, 2002 Before JOLLY, JONES, and WIENER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Darrell Lynn Bankston (# R1725), who is incarcerated at Wilkinso
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 02-60149 Conference Calendar DARRELL LYNN BANKSTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus JODY BRADLEY; ET AL., Defendants, CORRECTIONAL CORPORATION OF AMERICA (CCA), Defendant-Appellee. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi USDC No. 5:00-CV-127-BrS - December 12, 2002 Before JOLLY, JONES, and WIENER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Darrell Lynn Bankston (# R1725), who is incarcerated at Wilkinson..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-60149
Conference Calendar
DARRELL LYNN BANKSTON,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
JODY BRADLEY; ET AL.,
Defendants,
CORRECTIONAL CORPORATION OF AMERICA (CCA),
Defendant-Appellee.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Mississippi
USDC No. 5:00-CV-127-BrS
--------------------
December 12, 2002
Before JOLLY, JONES, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Darrell Lynn Bankston (# R1725), who is incarcerated at
Wilkinson County Correctional Facility (WCCF), appeals the grant
of summary judgment to Corrections Corporation of America (CCA).
Bankston’s amended complaint requested monetary damages from CCA,
which operates WCCF, based on an alleged assault of Bankston by
another inmate. We AFFIRM.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 02-60149
-2-
As part of his claim for relief, Bankston alleged
conclusionally that the assault occurred as a result of CCA’s
custom or policy which allowed correctional officers to double-
cell inmates whom they know to be enemies of one another. With
its motion for summary judgment, CCA filed a WCCF policy
statement which refuted this allegation. Bankston then failed
to file a response, as required by FED. R. CIV. P. 56(e).
Accordingly, the district court did not err by granting CCA’s
motion for summary judgment. See Celotex Corp. v. Catrett,
477 U.S. 317, 322-26 (1986).
AFFIRMED.