Filed: Jan. 29, 2003
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 00-50725 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus FRANCISCO OLIVAS-MONTOYA, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. P-00-CR-117-1-F - January 28, 2003 Before JONES, STEWART, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Merry A. Worley, court-appointed appellate counsel for defendant Francisco Olivas-Montoya (“Olivas”), has moved for leave
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 00-50725 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus FRANCISCO OLIVAS-MONTOYA, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. P-00-CR-117-1-F - January 28, 2003 Before JONES, STEWART, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Merry A. Worley, court-appointed appellate counsel for defendant Francisco Olivas-Montoya (“Olivas”), has moved for leave ..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-50725
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
FRANCISCO OLIVAS-MONTOYA,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. P-00-CR-117-1-F
--------------------
January 28, 2003
Before JONES, STEWART, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Merry A. Worley, court-appointed appellate counsel for
defendant Francisco Olivas-Montoya (“Olivas”), has moved for
leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders
v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Olivas has filed a response
to counsel’s motion. Our independent review of the brief and the
record discloses no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Counsel’s
motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 00-50725
-2-
further responsibilities, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See
5TH CIR. R. 42.2. Olivas’s motion for appointment of counsel is
DENIED.
ANDERS MOTION GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED; MOTION FOR
APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL DENIED.