Filed: Jun. 24, 2003
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT June 25, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 01-20906 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus FEDERICO PEREZ, JR., Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-95-CR-142-43 - Before DeMOSS, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Trude K. Scott, the attorney appointed to
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT June 25, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 01-20906 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus FEDERICO PEREZ, JR., Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-95-CR-142-43 - Before DeMOSS, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Trude K. Scott, the attorney appointed to r..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT June 25, 2003
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 01-20906
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
FEDERICO PEREZ, JR.,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. H-95-CR-142-43
--------------------
Before DeMOSS, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Trude K. Scott, the attorney appointed to represent Federico
Perez, Jr., on appeal, has requested leave to withdraw and has
filed a brief as required by Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738
(1967). Our review of counsel’s brief and Perez’s response and
our independent review of the record show that there are no
nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave to
withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 01-20906
-2-
responsibilities, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR.
R. 42.2.
MOTION TO WITHDRAW GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED.