Filed: Apr. 25, 2003
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS April 24, 2003 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 01-21206 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ADEMOLA JIBRIL ADESHOLA, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-00-CR-917-ALL - Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The attorney appointed to repres
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS April 24, 2003 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 01-21206 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ADEMOLA JIBRIL ADESHOLA, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-00-CR-917-ALL - Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The attorney appointed to represe..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS April 24, 2003
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 01-21206
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ADEMOLA JIBRIL ADESHOLA,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. H-00-CR-917-ALL
--------------------
Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The attorney appointed to represent Ademola Jibril Adeshola
has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required
by Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Adeshola has
received a copy of counsel's motion and brief but has not filed a
response. Our independent review of the brief and the record
discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel's motion
for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 01-21206
-2-
responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH
CIR. R. 42.2.