Filed: Apr. 25, 2003
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS April 25, 2003 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 01-21251 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus CEDRICK RODGERS, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-99-CR-737-2 - Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Cedrick Rodgers, federal prisoner # 87976-
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS April 25, 2003 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 01-21251 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus CEDRICK RODGERS, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-99-CR-737-2 - Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Cedrick Rodgers, federal prisoner # 87976-0..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS April 25, 2003
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 01-21251
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
CEDRICK RODGERS,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. H-99-CR-737-2
--------------------
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Cedrick Rodgers, federal prisoner # 87976-079 (Rodgers), has
appealed the district court’s order denying Rodgers’ request for
bail pending the district court’s consideration of his motion to
vacate, set aside, or correct sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 2255. While this appeal was pending, the district court denied
Rodgers’ 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. Accordingly, this appeal is
now moot. See Rocky v. King,
900 F.2d 864, 866-67 (5th Cir.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 01-21251
-2-
1990); Bailey v. Southerland,
821 F.2d 277, 278 (5th Cir. 1987).
Because the appeal is moot, it is DISMISSED.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
Appellant’s motion to dismiss is GRANTED; his counsel’s
motion to withdraw is also GRANTED.