Filed: Aug. 19, 2003
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS August 20, 2003 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 01-40891 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus RAUL PEREZ GONZALEZ, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-01-CR-179-2 - Before JONES, WIENER, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The lawyer appointed to represent Raul
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS August 20, 2003 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 01-40891 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus RAUL PEREZ GONZALEZ, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-01-CR-179-2 - Before JONES, WIENER, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The lawyer appointed to represent Raul ..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS August 20, 2003
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 01-40891
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
RAUL PEREZ GONZALEZ,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. B-01-CR-179-2
--------------------
Before JONES, WIENER, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The lawyer appointed to represent Raul Gonzalez has
requested leave to withdraw as counsel and has filed a brief as
required by Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Gonzalez
has filed no response.
Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses
no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, the motion for
leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities in this case, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 5TH
CIR. R. 42.2
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.