Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Madrid, 01-41446 (2003)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 01-41446 Visitors: 23
Filed: Apr. 25, 2003
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS April 24, 2003 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 01-41446 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JUAN P. MADRID, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. L-01-CR-242-7 - Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Private counsel appointed to represent Juan
More
                                                       United States Court of Appeals
                                                                Fifth Circuit
                                                              F I L E D
               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS           April 24, 2003
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
                                                           Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                   Clerk

                            No. 01-41446
                        Conference Calendar



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                     Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JUAN P. MADRID,

                                     Defendant-Appellant.

                      --------------------
          Appeal from the United States District Court
               for the Southern District of Texas
                     USDC No. L-01-CR-242-7
                      --------------------

Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Private counsel appointed to represent Juan P. Madrid has

requested leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by

Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967).    Madrid has not

responded to the motion.    Our independent review of the brief and

the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal.       Counsel’s

motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from




     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
                          No. 01-41446
                               -2-

further responsibilities, and the appeal is DISMISSED.   See 5TH

CIR. R. 42.2.

     MOTION GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer