Filed: Apr. 22, 2003
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS April 21, 2003 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 02-11213 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus PATRICK RYNARD BANKS, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:98-CR-298-2-D - Before JOLLY, JONES, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Court-appointed counsel for Patric
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS April 21, 2003 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 02-11213 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus PATRICK RYNARD BANKS, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:98-CR-298-2-D - Before JOLLY, JONES, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Court-appointed counsel for Patrick..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS April 21, 2003
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 02-11213
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
PATRICK RYNARD BANKS,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 3:98-CR-298-2-D
--------------------
Before JOLLY, JONES, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Court-appointed counsel for Patrick Rynard Banks has moved
for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by
Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Banks has received a
copy of counsel’s motion and brief, but has filed no response.
Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no
nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave
to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See
5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.