Filed: Jun. 24, 2003
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT June 25, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 02-11302 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ROBERTO OLIVAS, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:02-CR-106-1 - Before DeMOSS, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender, court-appointed cou
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT June 25, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 02-11302 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ROBERTO OLIVAS, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:02-CR-106-1 - Before DeMOSS, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender, court-appointed coun..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT June 25, 2003
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 02-11302
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ROBERTO OLIVAS,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:02-CR-106-1
--------------------
Before DeMOSS, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender, court-appointed counsel for
Roberto Olivas, has filed a motion to withdraw as counsel and a
brief in accordance with Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738
(1967). Olivas has not filed a response. Our independent review
of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous
issue. Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED,
counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and the APPEAL
IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.