Filed: Dec. 31, 2003
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS December 31, 2003 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 02-11322 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus RONALD LEE COOPER, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:95-CR-158-1-Y - Before BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender,
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS December 31, 2003 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 02-11322 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus RONALD LEE COOPER, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:95-CR-158-1-Y - Before BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender, c..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS December 31, 2003
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 02-11322
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
RONALD LEE COOPER,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:95-CR-158-1-Y
--------------------
Before BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender, court-appointed counsel for
Ronald Lee Cooper, has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a
brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967).
Cooper has received a copy of counsel’s motion and brief, but has
not filed a response. Our review of the brief filed by counsel and
of the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal.
Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel
is excused from further responsibilities, and the APPEAL IS
DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.