Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Rilwan, 02-21074 (2003)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 02-21074 Visitors: 29
Filed: Jun. 24, 2003
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT June 25, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 02-21074 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus IBRAHIM BABJIDE RILWAN, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-02-CR-1-ALL - Before DeMOSS, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Counsel for Ibrahim Babajide Rilwan has
More
                                                        United States Court of Appeals
                                                                 Fifth Circuit
                                                              F I L E D
                IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                  June 25, 2003

                                                          Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                  Clerk
                              No. 02-21074
                          Conference Calendar


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                           Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus

IBRAHIM BABJIDE RILWAN,

                                           Defendant-Appellant.

                       --------------------
           Appeal from the United States District Court
                for the Southern District of Texas
                      USDC No. H-02-CR-1-ALL
                       --------------------

Before DeMOSS, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Counsel for Ibrahim Babajide Rilwan has moved for leave

to withdraw from this appeal and has filed a brief as required

by Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967).    Rilwan was

mailed a copy of counsel’s motion and brief but has not filed

a response.    Our independent review of the brief and the record

discloses no nonfrivolous issue.    Accordingly, counsel’s motion

for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer