Filed: Jun. 24, 2003
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT June 25, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 02-21074 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus IBRAHIM BABJIDE RILWAN, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-02-CR-1-ALL - Before DeMOSS, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Counsel for Ibrahim Babajide Rilwan has
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT June 25, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 02-21074 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus IBRAHIM BABJIDE RILWAN, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-02-CR-1-ALL - Before DeMOSS, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Counsel for Ibrahim Babajide Rilwan has m..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT June 25, 2003
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 02-21074
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
IBRAHIM BABJIDE RILWAN,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. H-02-CR-1-ALL
--------------------
Before DeMOSS, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Counsel for Ibrahim Babajide Rilwan has moved for leave
to withdraw from this appeal and has filed a brief as required
by Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Rilwan was
mailed a copy of counsel’s motion and brief but has not filed
a response. Our independent review of the brief and the record
discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel’s motion
for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.