Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Henry, 02-30386 (2003)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 02-30386 Visitors: 77
Filed: Jan. 06, 2003
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 02-30386 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ALBERT C. HENRY, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 00-CR-50057-02 - January 3, 2003 Before JONES, STEWART, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Court-appointed counsel for Albert C. Henry has requested leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. Calif
More
               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT



                           No. 02-30386
                         Summary Calendar



                     UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                         Plaintiff-Appellee,

                              versus

                         ALBERT C. HENRY,

                                         Defendant-Appellant.


                       --------------------
          Appeal from the United States District Court
              for the Western District of Louisiana
                     USDC No. 00-CR-50057-02
                       --------------------
                          January 3, 2003


Before JONES, STEWART, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Court-appointed counsel for Albert C. Henry has requested

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v.

California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967).   Henry has not responded to his

counsel’s motion.   Our independent review of counsel’s brief and

the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal.   Counsel’s

motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from


     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
                           No. 02-30386
                                -2-

further responsibilities, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR.

R. 42.2.

     MOTION GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer