Filed: Apr. 24, 2003
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS April 23, 2003 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 02-30784 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JUAN SALGADO-DIAZ, also known as Alfredo Garcia Moreno, also known as Rafael Baes, also known as Rafael Baez-Salgado, also known as Feliz A. Santos, also known as Roberto Chaidez, also known as Juan Diaz, also known as Juan S. Diaz, also known as Camilo
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS April 23, 2003 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 02-30784 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JUAN SALGADO-DIAZ, also known as Alfredo Garcia Moreno, also known as Rafael Baes, also known as Rafael Baez-Salgado, also known as Feliz A. Santos, also known as Roberto Chaidez, also known as Juan Diaz, also known as Juan S. Diaz, also known as Camilo C..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS April 23, 2003
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 02-30784
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JUAN SALGADO-DIAZ, also known as Alfredo Garcia Moreno,
also known as Rafael Baes, also known as Rafael Baez-Salgado,
also known as Feliz A. Santos, also known as Roberto Chaidez,
also known as Juan Diaz, also known as Juan S. Diaz, also known
as Camilo Casillas,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Louisiana
USDC No. 01-CR-60126-ALL
--------------------
Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Juan
Salgado-Diaz (Salgado) has moved for leave to withdraw and has
filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,
386 U.S.
738 (1967). Salgado has not filed a response. Our independent
review of the record and counsel’s brief shows that there are no
nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 02-30784
-2-
for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities herein, and this appeal is DISMISSED. See
5TH CIR. R. 42.2.