Filed: May 19, 2003
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS May 16, 2003 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 02-40401 c/w No. 02-40455 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus FREDY ALBERTO AYALA, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-99-CR-9-1 - Before BARKSDALE, DEMOSS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defen
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS May 16, 2003 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 02-40401 c/w No. 02-40455 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus FREDY ALBERTO AYALA, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-99-CR-9-1 - Before BARKSDALE, DEMOSS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defend..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS May 16, 2003
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 02-40401 c/w No. 02-40455
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
FREDY ALBERTO AYALA,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeals from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. B-99-CR-9-1
--------------------
Before BARKSDALE, DEMOSS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Fredy
Alberto Ayala on appeal has requested leave to withdraw and has
filed a brief as required by Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738
(1967). Ayala has received a copy of counsel’s motion but has
not filed a response. Our independent review of the brief and
the record discloses no nonfrivolous issues for appeal.
Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is granted, counsel is
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 02-40401
-2-
excused from further responsibilities, and the appeal is
dismissed.
MOTION TO WITHDRAW GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED.