Filed: Jan. 29, 2003
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 02-40820 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MARY SUE ANDERSON, also known as Sue Brooks, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 9-01-CR-27-1 - January 29, 2003 Before JONES, STEWART, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Mary Sue Anderson is appealing her sentence imposed following her guilty plea conviction for filing a fal
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 02-40820 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MARY SUE ANDERSON, also known as Sue Brooks, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 9-01-CR-27-1 - January 29, 2003 Before JONES, STEWART, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Mary Sue Anderson is appealing her sentence imposed following her guilty plea conviction for filing a fals..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-40820
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
MARY SUE ANDERSON, also
known as Sue Brooks,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Texas
USDC No. 9-01-CR-27-1
--------------------
January 29, 2003
Before JONES, STEWART, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Mary Sue Anderson is appealing her sentence imposed following
her guilty plea conviction for filing a false claim with the
Internal Revenue Service. Anderson argues that the district
court’s clearly erred in increasing her offense level under
U.S.S.G. § 3B1.1(c) because the Government failed to show that she
supervised another participant in her criminal activity.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 02-40820
-2-
Anderson failed to substantiate her objections to the evidence
in the PSR, however. There was more than sufficient reliable
evidence presented to the district court to support the finding
that Anderson managed others in the course of committing her fraud.
See United States v. Brown,
54 F.3d 234, 242 (5th Cir. 1995). The
district court did not clearly err in making the adjustment
pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3B1.1(c).
AFFIRMED.