Filed: Aug. 19, 2003
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT August 20, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 02-41027 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus HECTOR GONZALEZ, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. M-00-CR-593-9 - Before JONES, WIENER, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Court appointed counsel for Hector Gonzale
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT August 20, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 02-41027 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus HECTOR GONZALEZ, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. M-00-CR-593-9 - Before JONES, WIENER, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Court appointed counsel for Hector Gonzalez..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT August 20, 2003
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 02-41027
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
HECTOR GONZALEZ,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. M-00-CR-593-9
--------------------
Before JONES, WIENER, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Court appointed counsel for Hector Gonzalez (“Gonzalez”) has
requested leave to withdraw from this appeal and has filed a
brief as required by Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967).
Gonzalez has received a copy of counsel’s motion and brief but
has not filed a response. Our independent review of the brief
and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issues for appeal.
Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 02-41027
-2-
excused from further responsibilities, and the appeal is
DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
APPEAL DISMISSED; MOTION TO WITHDRAW GRANTED.