Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Wilks, 02-50231 (2003)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 02-50231 Visitors: 17
Filed: Feb. 19, 2003
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 02-50231 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus LARRY RICHARD WILKS, JR., Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. P-01-CR-357-2 - February 18, 2003 Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Larry Richard Wilks, Jr. (“Wilks”) appeals the sentencing following his guilty plea conviction for possession with the
More
               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT



                           No. 02-50231
                         Summary Calendar


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                    Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

LARRY RICHARD WILKS, JR.,

                                    Defendant-Appellant.

                       --------------------
          Appeal from the United States District Court
                for the Western District of Texas
                     USDC No. P-01-CR-357-2
                       --------------------
                         February 18, 2003

Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Larry Richard Wilks, Jr. (“Wilks”) appeals the sentencing

following his guilty plea conviction for possession with the

intent to distribute methamphetamine.   Wilks argues that the

district court erred in not reducing his base offense level by

five levels after determining that he was entitled to a safety

valve adjustment and a U.S.S.G. § 5K1.1 downward departure.     This

court reviews the district court’s application of the Sentencing

Guidelines is de novo.   United States v. Charles, 
301 F.3d 309
,

     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
                          No. 02-50231
                               -2-

312-13 (5th Cir. 2002) (en banc).   If the oral sentence is

ambiguous, this court will look to the written judgment to

determine the intent of the district court.     Schurmann v. United

States, 
658 F.2d 389
, 390-91 (5th Cir. 1981).

     The record indicates that the district court determined that

Wilks’ total offense level was 22 after granting the Government’s

motion for a downward departure, and that Wilks was sentenced

within the guideline range.    Consequently, the district court did

not err in sentencing Wilks.

     AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer