Filed: Mar. 06, 2003
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 02-50826 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ARMANDO GRANADOS-VELASQUEZ, also known as Mando, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. EP-01-CR-1487-5-EP - February 28, 2003 Before GARWOOD, WIENER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Counsel appointed to represent Armando Granados-Velasquez on appeal has moved for leave to wit
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 02-50826 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ARMANDO GRANADOS-VELASQUEZ, also known as Mando, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. EP-01-CR-1487-5-EP - February 28, 2003 Before GARWOOD, WIENER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Counsel appointed to represent Armando Granados-Velasquez on appeal has moved for leave to with..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-50826
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ARMANDO GRANADOS-VELASQUEZ,
also known as Mando,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. EP-01-CR-1487-5-EP
--------------------
February 28, 2003
Before GARWOOD, WIENER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Counsel appointed to represent Armando Granados-Velasquez on
appeal has moved for leave to withdraw as counsel and has filed a
brief as required by Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967).
Granados has not filed a response to counsel's motion and brief.
Our independent review of the record discloses no non-frivolous
issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to
withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 02-50826
-2-
responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH
CIR. R. 42.2.