Filed: Jun. 03, 2003
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS June 3, 2003 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 02-51082 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff- Appellee, versus JUAN VALENTE SILLERO-LLANOS, Defendant- Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. A-02-CR-210-ALL-SS - Before JONES, STEWART and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Court-appointed counsel for Juan
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS June 3, 2003 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 02-51082 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff- Appellee, versus JUAN VALENTE SILLERO-LLANOS, Defendant- Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. A-02-CR-210-ALL-SS - Before JONES, STEWART and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Court-appointed counsel for Juan V..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
June 3, 2003
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 02-51082
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-
Appellee,
versus
JUAN VALENTE SILLERO-LLANOS,
Defendant-
Appellant.
-------------------------------------------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. A-02-CR-210-ALL-SS
-------------------------------------------------------
Before JONES, STEWART and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Court-appointed counsel for Juan Valente Sillero-Llanos (Sillero) has moved for leave to
withdraw from this appeal of the revocation of Sillero’s probation and has filed a brief as required by
Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). In response, Sillero has filed various motions requesting,
inter alia, the appointment of counsel, discovery, and a stay of the execution of his sentence.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be
published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
Our independent review of the brief, Sillero’s motions, and the record discloses no
nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,
counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR.
R. 42.2. Sillero’s motions are DENIED.
-2-