Jenkins v. Cajun Credit, 02-60600 (2003)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Number: 02-60600
Visitors: 27
Filed: Apr. 15, 2003
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS April 15, 2003 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 02-60600 _ HAL JENKINS Plaintiff-Appellant, versus CAJUN CREDIT OF MACON; BANKERS LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF FLORIDA Defendants-Appellees. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi USDC No. 4:00-CV-185 _ Before GARWOOD, JOLLY, and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* We have reviewe
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS April 15, 2003 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 02-60600 _ HAL JENKINS Plaintiff-Appellant, versus CAJUN CREDIT OF MACON; BANKERS LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF FLORIDA Defendants-Appellees. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi USDC No. 4:00-CV-185 _ Before GARWOOD, JOLLY, and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* We have reviewed..
More
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS April 15, 2003 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _____________________ Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 02-60600 _____________________ HAL JENKINS Plaintiff-Appellant, versus CAJUN CREDIT OF MACON; BANKERS LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF FLORIDA Defendants-Appellees. _________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi USDC No. 4:00-CV-185 _________________________________________________________________ Before GARWOOD, JOLLY, and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* We have reviewed the record, read the briefs and heard the arguments of the parties. After doing so, we are convinced that the thorough treatment of the issues by the district court reflects no reversible error. For the essentially the reasons given by the district court in its thorough and able opinion, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Source: CourtListener
