Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Brown, 03-10002 (2003)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 03-10002 Visitors: 30
Filed: Aug. 19, 2003
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT August 19, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 03-10002 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus TERINA RENAE BROWN, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:97-CR-245-2-P - Before JONES, WIENER, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Terina Renae Brown (“Brown”), federal
More
                                                       United States Court of Appeals
                                                                Fifth Circuit
                                                             F I L E D
               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                 August 19, 2003

                                                          Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                  Clerk
                            No. 03-10002
                        Conference Calendar


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                    Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

TERINA RENAE BROWN,

                                    Defendant-Appellant.

                       --------------------
          Appeal from the United States District Court
               for the Northern District of Texas
                    USDC No. 3:97-CR-245-2-P
                       --------------------

Before JONES, WIENER, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Terina Renae Brown (“Brown”), federal inmate #30881-077,

appeals the district court’s denial of her 18 U.S.C. § 3582

motion for a reduction in her sentence.   Brown received a

stipulated sentence as permitted by FED. R. CRIM. P. 11(e)(1)(C).

Because Brown’s sentence was imposed in accordance with

Rule 11(e)(1)(C), 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) does not apply.

Consequently, the district court did not abuse its discretion in




     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
                           No. 03-10002
                                -2-

denying Brown’s motion.   United States v. Shaw, 
30 F.3d 26
, 29

(5th Cir. 1994).

     AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer