Filed: Dec. 10, 2003
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT December 10, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 03-10186 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus GRAYSON GUADALUPE GRIFFIN, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:02-CR-00085-ALL-Y - Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT December 10, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 03-10186 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus GRAYSON GUADALUPE GRIFFIN, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:02-CR-00085-ALL-Y - Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public ..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT December 10, 2003
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 03-10186
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
GRAYSON GUADALUPE GRIFFIN,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:02-CR-00085-ALL-Y
--------------------
Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender, appointed to represent Grayson
Guadalupe Griffin, has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed
a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). A
copy of counsel’s motion and brief were sent to Griffin, but he
has not filed a response. Our review of the brief and of the
record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly,
the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 03-10186
-2-
from further responsibilities, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See
5TH CIR. R. 42.2.