Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Cantrell v. Barnhart, 03-10468 (2003)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 03-10468 Visitors: 34
Filed: Oct. 21, 2003
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT October 21, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 03-10468 Summary Calendar JIMMIE L. CANTRELL Plaintiff-Appellant v. JO ANNE B. BARNHART, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY Defendant-Appellee - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:02-CV-00496-Y - Before KING, Chief Judge, and HIGGINBOTHAM and WIENER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* J
More
                                                       United States Court of Appeals
                                                                Fifth Circuit
                                                              F I L E D
               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                  October 21, 2003

                                                           Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                   Clerk
                            No. 03-10468
                          Summary Calendar



JIMMIE L. CANTRELL

                                     Plaintiff-Appellant

     v.

JO ANNE B. BARNHART,
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY

                                     Defendant-Appellee

                      --------------------
          Appeal from the United States District Court
               for the Northern District of Texas
                    USDC No. 4:02-CV-00496-Y
                      --------------------

Before KING, Chief Judge, and HIGGINBOTHAM and WIENER, Circuit
Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Jimmie L. Cantrell appeals from the district court's

judgment affirming the Commissioner of Social Security's denial

of disability benefits.   She argues that the Administrative Law

Judge ("ALJ") erroneously failed to accord great weight to the

opinions of her treating psychiatrist and improperly relied on

the opinion of the medical expert.   We conclude that the ALJ

applied the correct legal standard and the decision was supported

     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
                           No. 03-10468
                                -2-

by substantial evidence.   See Newton v. Apfel, 
209 F.3d 448
,

455-56 (5th Cir. 2000); Greenspan v. Shalala, 
38 F.3d 232
, 237

(5th Cir. 1994).

     AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer