Filed: Oct. 21, 2003
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT October 21, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 03-10468 Summary Calendar JIMMIE L. CANTRELL Plaintiff-Appellant v. JO ANNE B. BARNHART, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY Defendant-Appellee - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:02-CV-00496-Y - Before KING, Chief Judge, and HIGGINBOTHAM and WIENER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* J
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT October 21, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 03-10468 Summary Calendar JIMMIE L. CANTRELL Plaintiff-Appellant v. JO ANNE B. BARNHART, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY Defendant-Appellee - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:02-CV-00496-Y - Before KING, Chief Judge, and HIGGINBOTHAM and WIENER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Ji..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT October 21, 2003
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 03-10468
Summary Calendar
JIMMIE L. CANTRELL
Plaintiff-Appellant
v.
JO ANNE B. BARNHART,
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Defendant-Appellee
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:02-CV-00496-Y
--------------------
Before KING, Chief Judge, and HIGGINBOTHAM and WIENER, Circuit
Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Jimmie L. Cantrell appeals from the district court's
judgment affirming the Commissioner of Social Security's denial
of disability benefits. She argues that the Administrative Law
Judge ("ALJ") erroneously failed to accord great weight to the
opinions of her treating psychiatrist and improperly relied on
the opinion of the medical expert. We conclude that the ALJ
applied the correct legal standard and the decision was supported
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 03-10468
-2-
by substantial evidence. See Newton v. Apfel,
209 F.3d 448,
455-56 (5th Cir. 2000); Greenspan v. Shalala,
38 F.3d 232, 237
(5th Cir. 1994).
AFFIRMED.