Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Piedra, 03-20128 (2003)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 03-20128 Visitors: 38
Filed: Oct. 21, 2003
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT October 22, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 03-20128 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ELIER PIEDRA, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-01-CR-714-1 - Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appo
More
                                                         United States Court of Appeals
                                                                  Fifth Circuit
                                                                 F I L E D
                 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                         FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                   October 22, 2003

                                                              Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                      Clerk
                              No. 03-20128
                          Conference Calendar



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                        Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus

ELIER PIEDRA,

                                        Defendant-Appellant.

                         --------------------
             Appeal from the United States District Court
                  for the Southern District of Texas
                        USDC No. H-01-CR-714-1
                         --------------------

Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Elier

Piedra has requested leave to withdraw and has filed a brief

as required by Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967).

Piedra has not filed a response.       Our independent review of the

brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal.

Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is

DISMISSED.     See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.


     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer