Filed: Oct. 21, 2003
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT October 22, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 03-20128 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ELIER PIEDRA, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-01-CR-714-1 - Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appo
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT October 22, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 03-20128 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ELIER PIEDRA, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-01-CR-714-1 - Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appoi..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT October 22, 2003
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 03-20128
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ELIER PIEDRA,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. H-01-CR-714-1
--------------------
Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Elier
Piedra has requested leave to withdraw and has filed a brief
as required by Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967).
Piedra has not filed a response. Our independent review of the
brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal.
Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is
excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is
DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.