Filed: Dec. 10, 2003
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT December 10, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 03-20416 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus FREDERICK CORNELIUS KNOX, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-02-CR-241-3 - Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Jerome Godinich, Jr., cou
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT December 10, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 03-20416 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus FREDERICK CORNELIUS KNOX, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-02-CR-241-3 - Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Jerome Godinich, Jr., cour..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT December 10, 2003
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 03-20416
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
FREDERICK CORNELIUS KNOX,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. H-02-CR-241-3
--------------------
Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Jerome Godinich, Jr., court-appointed counsel for Frederick
Cornelius Knox, has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a
brief as required by Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967).
Knox has not filed a response. Our independent review of the
brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue in this
direct appeal. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is
GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein,
and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.