Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Mitchell, 03-40005 (2003)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 03-40005 Visitors: 22
Filed: Aug. 19, 2003
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT August 20, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 03-40005 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus KENNETH P. MITCHELL, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. C-95-CR-133-1 - Before JONES, WIENER, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender, appointed
More
                                                       United States Court of Appeals
                                                                Fifth Circuit
                                                             F I L E D
               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                 August 20, 2003

                                                          Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                  Clerk
                            No. 03-40005
                        Conference Calendar


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                    Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus

KENNETH P. MITCHELL,

                                    Defendant-Appellant.

                       --------------------
           Appeal from the United States District Court
                for the Southern District of Texas
                      USDC No. C-95-CR-133-1
                       --------------------

Before JONES, WIENER, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     The Federal Public Defender, appointed to represent Kenneth

P. Mitchell, has requested leave to withdraw and has filed a

brief as required by Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967).

Mitchell has not filed a response to counsel’s motion and brief.

Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses

no nonfrivolous issue for appeal.   Counsel’s motion for leave

to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further

responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED.

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer