Filed: Aug. 19, 2003
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT August 20, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 03-40005 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus KENNETH P. MITCHELL, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. C-95-CR-133-1 - Before JONES, WIENER, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender, appointed
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT August 20, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 03-40005 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus KENNETH P. MITCHELL, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. C-95-CR-133-1 - Before JONES, WIENER, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender, appointed ..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT August 20, 2003
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 03-40005
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
KENNETH P. MITCHELL,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. C-95-CR-133-1
--------------------
Before JONES, WIENER, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender, appointed to represent Kenneth
P. Mitchell, has requested leave to withdraw and has filed a
brief as required by Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967).
Mitchell has not filed a response to counsel’s motion and brief.
Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses
no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave
to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED.
See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.