Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Vivar-Lopez, 03-40165 (2003)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 03-40165 Visitors: 12
Filed: Aug. 19, 2003
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT August 20, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 03-40165 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus WILLIAM VIVAR-LOPEZ, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:02-CR-73-1 - Before JONES, WIENER, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender, court-appoi
More
                                                        United States Court of Appeals
                                                                 Fifth Circuit
                                                              F I L E D
               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                  August 20, 2003

                                                           Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                   Clerk
                            No. 03-40165
                        Conference Calendar


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                     Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

WILLIAM VIVAR-LOPEZ,

                                     Defendant-Appellant.

                        --------------------
           Appeal from the United States District Court
                 for the Eastern District of Texas
                       USDC No. 1:02-CR-73-1
                        --------------------

Before JONES, WIENER, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     The Federal Public Defender, court-appointed counsel for

William Vivar-Lopez, has moved for leave to withdraw and has

filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967).   Vivar-Lopez has not filed a response.     Our review of the

briefs and of the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for

appeal.   Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and

the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.    See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.


     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer