Filed: Dec. 10, 2003
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT December 10, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III No. 03-40335 Clerk Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus TERRY WILLIAM GAUGH, also known as Terry Gough, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. C-02-CR-144-2 - Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Cou
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT December 10, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III No. 03-40335 Clerk Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus TERRY WILLIAM GAUGH, also known as Terry Gough, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. C-02-CR-144-2 - Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Coun..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT December 10, 2003
Charles R. Fulbruge III
No. 03-40335 Clerk
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
TERRY WILLIAM GAUGH,
also known as Terry Gough,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. C-02-CR-144-2
--------------------
Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Counsel appointed to represent Terry William Gaugh has filed
a motion for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required
by Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Gaugh has not
filed a response. Our independent review of the brief and the
record discloses no nonfrivolous issue in this direct appeal.
Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel
is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL
IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.