Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Romero-Martinez, 03-40821 (2003)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 03-40821 Visitors: 16
Filed: Dec. 10, 2003
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT December 10, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 03-40821 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JORGE ARMANDO ROMERO-MARTINEZ, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. M-03-CR-23-1 - Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Jorge Armando Romero-
More
                                                        United States Court of Appeals
                                                                 Fifth Circuit
                                                              F I L E D
                IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                December 10, 2003

                                                           Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                   Clerk
                             No. 03-40821
                         Conference Calendar



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                     Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JORGE ARMANDO ROMERO-MARTINEZ,

                                     Defendant-Appellant.

                       --------------------
          Appeal from the United States District Court
               for the Southern District of Texas
                      USDC No. M-03-CR-23-1
                       --------------------

Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Jorge Armando Romero-Martinez appeals his illegal reentry

conviction.    Romero concedes that the issue whether the “felony”

and “aggravated felony” provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1)&(2)

are unconstitutional in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 
530 U.S. 466
(2000), is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States,

523 U.S. 224
(1998), and he raises it solely to preserve its

further review by the Supreme Court.    Apprendi did not overrule

Almendarez-Torres.    See 
Apprendi, 530 U.S. at 489-90
.     This court

     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
                            No. 03-40821
                                 -2-

must therefore follow the precedent set in Almendarez-Torres

“unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule

it.”    See United States v. Dabeit, 
231 F.3d 979
, 984 (5th Cir.

2000) (internal quotation and citation omitted).

       AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer